ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tredaniel, J
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tredaniel, J
Right arrow Articles by Hirsch, A
Eur Respir J 1994; 7: 1877-1888
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1994


Original Articles

Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and risk of lung cancer: the epidemiological evidence

J Tredaniel, P Boffetta, R Saracci, and A Hirsch

Exposure of nonsmokers to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) is widespread in European countries, the most serious exposures occurring at home and in the workplace. Epidemiological studies available up to 1986 have been reviewed by several international and national authorities, which agreed in concluding that ETS exposure is causally related to lung cancer. A number of epidemiological studies have been published since then, and have confirmed this association. The possibility of positive results due to bias has been envisaged; it seems, however, that such bias could not explain the whole excess of lung cancer. Few data are available on confounders, such as diet and previous history of lung disease, that might be responsible for the association; however, there is no evidence that they play an important role. Moreover, the biological plausibility of a causal association is supported by the similarity of the composition of ETS and active smoke. The causal association between ETS exposure and lung cancer now seems well-established; however, its public health impact is still debated. Estimates are available from the United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and England.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P. N. Lee, J. S. Fry, and B. Forey
Revisiting the Association between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: V. Overall Conclusions
Indoor and Built Environment, March 1, 2002; 11(2): 59 - 82.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
D. H. YATES, H. BREEN, and P. S. THOMAS
Passive Smoke Inhalation Decreases Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Normal Subjects
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 15, 2001; 164(6): 1043 - 1046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
R Chen, H Tunstall-Pedoe, and R Tavendale
Environmental tobacco smoke and lung function in employees who never smoked: the Scottish MONICA study
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2001; 58(9): 563 - 568.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
J. S. Fry and P. N. Lee
Revisiting the Association between Environmental Tobacco Smoke Exposure and Lung Cancer Risk: I. The Dose-Response Relationship with Amount and Duration of Smoking by the Husband
Indoor and Built Environment, November 1, 2000; 9(6): 303 - 316.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Indoor and Built EnvironmentHome page
P.N. Lee and A.J. Thornton
Review : A Critical Commentary on Views Expressed by IARC in Relation to Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Lung Cancer
Indoor and Built Environment, May 1, 1998; 7(3): 129 - 145.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1994 by the European Respiratory Society.