ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elliott, M.
Right arrow Articles by Moxham, J
Eur Respir J 1993; 6: 1055-1059
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1993


Original Articles

An evaluation of P0.1 measured in mouth and oesophagus, during carbon dioxide rebreathing in COPD

MW Elliott, DA Mulvey, M Green, and J Moxham

The pressure generated 100 ms after the onset of an occluded inspiratory effort (P0.1) is advocated and used as a measure of respiratory centre drive. We have re-examined P0.1, measured simultaneously in the mouth (Pmo0.1) and the oesophagus (Poes0.1), during carbon dioxide rebreathing, in eight patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, to see whether either indicates central respiratory drive. Pmo0.1 was identical to Poes0.1 in 4 out of 61, greater than Poes0.1 in 18 out of 61, and less than Poes0.1 in 39 out of 61 measurements (overall Poes0.1-Pmo0.1, median +0.075, range -0.175 to +1.01 kPa). Within a rebreathing run in an individual patient, there was considerable variability in the relationship Pmo0.1/Poes0.1 (0.89 +/- 0.24), coefficient of variation (CoV%) 14.4 +/- 3.7%), in the end-expiratory oesophageal pressure (0.7 +/- 0.54 kPa, CoV% 105 +/- 106%), and in the time delay between the onset of a fall in oesophageal pressure (Poes) from the end-expiratory level to the beginning of inspiration, defined as starting when mouth pressure (Pmo) fell below atmospheric pressure (129 +/- 25 ms, CoV% 22.5 +/- 5.3%). We conclude that the problem of determining the true onset of inspiratory muscle activity from pressure data, and the likelihood that breaths are taken from different lung volumes, make it unlikely that Poes0.1 accurately represents central respiratory drive during rebreathing in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Furthermore, Pmo0.1 differed from Poes0.1 during rebreathing, and their relationship was not constant, so that Pmo0.1 is even less likely to be a useful reflection of central nervous system output or respiratory centre drive in such patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
B. Fauroux, G. Aubertin, E. Cohen, A. Clement, and F. Lofaso
Sniff nasal inspiratory pressure in children with muscular, chest wall or lung disease
Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 113 - 117.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
M. HAYOT, M. RAMONATXO, S. MATECKI, J. MILIC-EMILI, and C. PREFAUT
Noninvasive Assessment of Inspiratory Muscle Function during Exercise
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., December 1, 2000; 162(6): 2201 - 2207.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the European Respiratory Society.