ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Drent, M
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Drent, M
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, J.
Eur Respir J 1993; 6: 803-810
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1993


Original Articles

Differences in BAL fluid variables in interstitial lung diseases evaluated by discriminant analysis

M Drent, PG Mulder, SS Wagenaar, HC Hoogsteden, H van Velzen-Blad, and JM van den Bosch

The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of distinguishing between patients with similarities in clinical presentation, suffering from three frequently occurring interstitial lung diseases, by means of discriminant analysis, using a number of selected variables derived from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) analysis. The study involved all 277 patients, who had an initial bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in the period 1980-1990. These patients belonged to the following diagnostic groups: sarcoidosis (n = 193), subacute extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) (n = 39) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (n = 45). Thirty healthy volunteers were used as controls. Cellular and non-cellular constituents of BALF were evaluated. Variables, which could be used to discriminate among the three diagnostic groups were: yield of recovered BALF, total cell count, and percentages of alveolar macrophages, lymphocytes, polymorphonuclear neutrophils, eosinophils and plasma cells in BALF. When the set of data used to predict the membership of patients to diagnostic groups (test set) was the same as that in which the discriminant analysis was performed (learning set), 93% of the cases were correctly classified. This percentage decreased to 90%, however, when the test set was different from the learning set. It is possible to discriminate among patients with sarcoidosis, EAA or IPF with these selected variables. It appears that bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is useful as an adjunct in concert with other diagnostic methods.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
S. Greco, A. Marruchella, M. Massari, and C. Saltini
Predictive value of BAL cellular analysis in differentiating pulmonary tuberculosis and sarcoidosis
Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2005; 26(2): 360 - 362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
L. Welker, R.A. Jorres, U. Costabel, and H. Magnussen
Predictive value of BAL cell differentials in the diagnosis of interstitial lung diseases
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2004; 24(6): 1000 - 1006.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.M. du Bois and A.U. Wells
Cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis/idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2001; 18(32_suppl): 43S - 55s.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
A. XAUBET, C. AGUSTI, P. LUBURICH, J. ROCA, C. MONTON, M. C. AYUSO, J. A. BARBERA, and R. RODRIGUEZ-ROISIN
Pulmonary Function Tests and CT Scan in the Management of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1998; 158(2): 431 - 436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the European Respiratory Society.