ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Azarian, R
Right arrow Articles by Harf, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Azarian, R
Right arrow Articles by Harf, A
Eur Respir J 1993; 6: 552-558
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1993


Original Articles

Assessment of the respiratory compliance in awake subjects using pressure support

R Azarian, F Lofaso, F Zerah, H Lorino, G Atlan, D Isabey, and A Harf

Pressure support (PS), a new mode of ventilatory assistance, is known to induce respiratory muscle relaxation. It was used to obtain reliable measurements of the compliance of the respiratory system (Crs) in awake subjects. PS was applied, through a mouthpiece, at four successive levels (0, 0.75, 1 and 1.25 kPa) to 30 healthy subjects. At the highest PS level, the subject's relaxation was obtained as assessed by a decrease in the occlusion pressure from 0.10 +/- 0.06 to 0.05 +/- 0.04 kPa, whereas the minute ventilation increased (from 7.5 +/- 1.5 to 13.8 +/- 3.3 l.min-1), and the end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PCO2) decreased (from 5.0 +/- 0.4 to 3.2 +/- 0.5 kPa) below its apnoea threshold. In three subjects, respiratory muscle relaxation was confirmed by a fall in diaphragmatic electromyographic activity. Crs was calculated as the ratio of the tidal volume to the corresponding end-inspiratory airway pressure (i.e. PS level) since, at end inspiration, a zero-flow period was obtained. Crs was highly correlated (r = 0.77) to the height (Ht) of the subjects: Crs (l.kPa-1) = 3.56 x Ht (m) -4.86 (+/- 0.23), allowing normal values to be determined. In order to evaluate the applicability of the method to patients, Crs was measured in four patients with scoliosis, and was found to range from 45-82% of the predicted values. It is suggested that this simple method of Crs determination may be used to characterize various chest wall or pulmonary diseases.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
T. Sharshar, G. Desmarais, B. Louis, G. Macadou, R. Porcher, A. Harf, J.-C. Raphael, D. Isabey, and F. Lofaso
Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Control of Airway Pressure Support in Healthy Subjects
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., October 1, 2003; 168(7): 760 - 769.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
N Hart, A Hunt, M I Polkey, B Fauroux, F Lofaso, and A K Simonds
Comparison of proportional assist ventilation and pressure support ventilation in chronic respiratory failure due to neuromuscular and chest wall deformity
Thorax, November 1, 2002; 57(11): 979 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
J.-L. Diehl, D. Isabey, G. Desmarais, L. Brochard, A. Harf, and F. Lofaso
Physiological effects of alveolar, tracheal, and "standard" pressure supports
J Appl Physiol, July 1, 1999; 87(1): 428 - 437.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
B. Fauroux, D. Isabey, G. Desmarais, L. Brochard, A. Harf, and F. Lofaso
Nonchemical influence of inspiratory pressure support on inspiratory activity in humans
J Appl Physiol, December 1, 1998; 85(6): 2169 - 2175.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1993 by the European Respiratory Society.