ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Boulet, L.
Right arrow Articles by Turcotte, H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Boulet, L.
Right arrow Articles by Turcotte, H
Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 979-984
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1991

Clinical Trial

Influence of water content of inspired air during and after exercise on induced bronchoconstriction

LP Boulet and H Turcotte

This study looked at the influence of inspired air water content on exercise-induced bronchospasm (EIB). On separate days, 12 mild asthmatics (4M, 8F), aged 18-39 yrs (mean: 27 yrs), performed four six minute steady-state exercises on ergometer at 80% of their maximum workload. Exercises were randomized to the following inspired air conditions: dry air (0% relative humidity (RH] during exercise followed by dry (DD) or humid air (100% RH) (DH) after exercise, humid air during exercise followed by dry (HD) or humid air (HH). Room temperature was kept constant (22 +/- 1 degree C) at all visits. Forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was measured before and every 5 min for 25 min after exercise. Ventilation (VE) was not significantly different whether the exercise was done under dry or humid air. There was a residual bronchodilatation at the end of exercises performed in humid air, while at this time FEV1 was already lower than baseline when exercise was done in dry air conditions. The maximal fall in FEV1(%) following exercise was significantly greater after those performed in dry air: DD (29 +/- 5.6%) and DH (30 +/- 5.8%) than in humid air: HD (12 +/- 4.9%) and HH (20 +/- 4.9%) (p less than 0.05). The time-course of recovery from bronchoconstriction was significantly improved when inhaling dry air after exercise. However, the difference found in the maximal % fall in FEV1 after exercise when recovery was in dry compared to humid air did not achieve statistical significance. In conclusion, EIB is influenced by the changes in water content during and after exercise. Bronchoconstriction following exercise is minimal if exercise is done in humid air and recovery in dry air, and maximal if the exercise is performed in dry air and recovery in humid air.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 NEJMHome page
E.R. McFadden and I. A. Gilbert
Exercise-Induced Asthma
N. Engl. J. Med., May 12, 1994; 330(19): 1362 - 1367.
[Full Text]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the European Respiratory Society.