ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Prost, J.
Right arrow Articles by Margairaz, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Prost, J.
Right arrow Articles by Margairaz, A
Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 683-687
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1991


Clinical Trial

Comparison of the effects of intravenous almitrine and positive end-expiratory pressure on pulmonary gas exchange in adult respiratory distress syndrome

JF Prost, P Desche, F Jardin, and A Margairaz

The effects of almitrine on pulmonary gas exchange and haemodynamics were compared to those of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in 10 patients with a severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) who required continuous mechanical ventilation. Haemodynamic and gas exchange measurements were made before and after 30 min of PEEP at a level of 10 cmH2O, then 30 min later, before and at the end of the intravenous infusion of almitrine at a dose of 0.25 mg.kg-1 in 30 min. There was no significant difference between baseline gas exchange and haemodynamic parameters. PEEP and almitrine increased Pao (p = 0.001) from 10.9 to 12.6 kPa and from 10.6 to 12.6 kPa (1 kPa = 7.5 mmHg), respectively, and ratio of venous admixture to total blood flow (Qs/Qt) decreased (p less than 0.001) from 34 to 29% and from 33 to 29%, respectively, the effects of PEEP and almitrine being not significantly different. Neither PEEP nor almitrine caused a significant change in arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2). The haemodynamic parameters did not change significantly with almitrine, whereas mean systemic arterial pressure decreased from 85.4 to 81.1 mmHg (p less than 0.05) with PEEP. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that both treatments improve ventilation/perfusion (VA/Q) distributions, by an increase in functional residual capacity in the case of PEEP and a redistribution of pulmonary perfusion in the case of almitrine.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JNMHome page
D. P. Schuster, C. Anderson, J. Kozlowski, and N. Lange
Regional Pulmonary Perfusion in Patients with Acute Pulmonary Edema
J. Nucl. Med., July 1, 2002; 43(7): 863 - 870.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Moutafis, N. Dalibon, N. Liu, G. Kuhlman, and M. Fischler
The Effects of Intravenous Almitrine on Oxygenation and Hemodynamics During One-Lung Ventilation
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2002; 94(4): 830 - 834.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
L. PAPAZIAN, A. ROCH, F. BREGEON, X. THIRION, F. GAILLAT, P. SAUX, V. FULACHIER, Y. JAMMES, and J.-P. AUFFRAY
Inhaled Nitric Oxide and Vasoconstrictors in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., August 1, 1999; 160(2): 473 - 479.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
M. Moutafis, N. Dalibon, A. Colchen, and M. Fischler
Improving Oxygenation During Bronchopulmonary Lavage Using Nitric Oxide Inhalation and Almitrine Infusion
Anesth. Analg., August 1, 1999; 89(2): 302 - 302.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
SEMIN CARDIOTHORAC VASC ANESTHHome page
S. C. Body and S. K. Shernan
The Utility of Nitric Oxide in the Postoperative Period
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, March 1, 1998; 2(1): 4 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the European Respiratory Society.