ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van Hengstum, M
Right arrow Articles by Corstens, F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van Hengstum, M
Right arrow Articles by Corstens, F
Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 651-654
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1991


Clinical Trial

Effect of positive expiratory pressure mask physiotherapy (PEP) versus forced expiration technique (FET/PD) on regional lung clearance in chronic bronchitics

M van Hengstum, J Festen, C Beurskens, M Hankel, F Beekman, and F Corstens

On theoretical grounds it is assumed that positive expiratory pressure mask physiotherapy (PEP) as a means of promoting mucus clearance is especially effective in the more distal airways. In a randomized cross-over trial including a control measurement the effect of PEP and of the forced expiration technique combined with postural drainage (FET/PD) on regional lung clearance was evaluated in seven patients with chronic bronchitis and abundant sputum production (mean 32 g.day-1). PEP consisted of positive expiratory pressure mask breathing interspersed with breathing exercises, forced expiration manoeuvres (huffing) and, if necessary, coughing. FET consisted of breathing exercises, huffing and also, if necessary, coughing. FET was combined with PD. Following inhalation of a radio-aerosol regional lung clearance was estimated by means of gamma camera imaging. The results after PEP appeared to be not significantly different from control. The mean clearance in all three lung zones (peripheral, intermediate and inner) was largest after FET/PD as compared with PEP and control. Statistical significance (p less than 0.02) was reached only for clearance in the inner region. It is concluded that PEP has no demonstrable effect on regional lung clearance in these patients.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Chronic Respiratory DiseaseHome page
A. E Hollandl and B. M Buttonl
Is there a role for airway clearance techniques in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease?
Chronic Respiratory Disease, April 1, 2006; 3(2): 83 - 91.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the European Respiratory Society.