ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Osterman, K
Right arrow Articles by Kallen, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Osterman, K
Right arrow Articles by Kallen, A
Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 175-179
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1991


Clinical Trial

Bricanyl Turbuhaler in the treatment of asthma: a six week multi-centre study carried out in Sweden, the United Kingdom, Denmark, Norway and Finland

K Osterman, E Stahl, and A Kallen

Two hundred and fifty eight adult patients with bronchial asthma participated in an open, parallel group study of 8 wks duration. During a 2 wk run-in period the beta 2-agonist terbutaline (0.5 mg q.i.d) was delivered via a pressurized freon aerosol, Bricanyl metered dose inhaler (MDI). During the following 6 wks, one third of the patients continued with MDI and two thirds with the same dose of terbutaline in the form of dry powder, Bricanyl Turbuhaler. There were no statistically significant differences in the increases in peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) after inhalation between the two treatment groups. The asthma symptom scores decreased in the Turbuhaler group during the study but remained the same in the MDI group. No difference in use of extra trial medication during the day was found. During the night, the difference was statistically significant in favour of Turbuhaler (p less than 0.05). Turbuhaler was well accepted and easy to use. As compared with the MDI used during run-in, 50% of the patients in the Turbuhaler group preferred to use Turbuhaler and 26% MDI, whilst 24% had no preference. In conclusion, Turbuhaler was at least as effective as MDI during the whole Turbuhaler life-span (6 wks).


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ERRHome page
P. Anderson
Patient preference for and satisfaction with inhaler devices
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2005; 14(96): 109 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
F. S F Ram, J. Wright, D. Brocklebank, and J. E S White
Systematic review of clinical effectiveness of pressurised metered dose inhalers versus other hand held inhaler devices for delivering beta 2 agonists bronchodilators in asthma
BMJ, October 20, 2001; 323(7318): 901 - 901.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
D A Hughes, A Woodcock, and T Walley
Review of therapeutically equivalent alternatives to short acting beta 2 adrenoceptor agonists delivered via chlorofluorocarbon-containing inhalers
Thorax, December 1, 1999; 54(12): 1087 - 1092.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the European Respiratory Society.