ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kongerud, J
Right arrow Articles by Soyseth, V
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kongerud, J
Right arrow Articles by Soyseth, V
Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 159-166
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1991


Original Articles

Methacholine responsiveness, respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function in aluminum potroom workers

J Kongerud and V Soyseth

The relationship between nonspecific bronchial reactivity and work-related asthmatic symptoms was examined in a cross-sectional study of 337 aluminium potroom workers by a shortened method of continuous methacholine nebulization. The provocative concentration producing a 20% fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) (PC20) was less than or equal to 8 mg.ml-1 (hyperresponsiveness) in 17 workers (5%), whilst minor responsiveness (8 mg.ml-1 less than PC20 less than 32 mg.ml-1) was present in 24 subjects (7%). The prevalence of work-related asthmatic symptoms was 9%. Female sex, ex-smoker and airflow limitation were significant predictors of methacholine responsiveness (p less than 0.05). In a multiple logistic regression analysis the odds ratios (OR) for work-related asthmatic symptoms was 10.8 (95% confidence interval: 2.9-40.6) for hyperresponsiveness and 4.4 (95% confidence interval: 1.2-16.4) for minor responsiveness. The sensitivity, specificity and predictivity of PC20 less than 32 mg.ml-1 for work-related asthmatic symptoms were 35, 92 and 35%, respectively, whilst the agreement, when adjusted for the by chance expectation, was 0.27 (95% confidence interval: 0.10-0.54). Although a significant association was found between bronchial reactivity and work-related asthmatic symptoms, the usefulness of the methacholine test as a tool for detection of work-related asthmatic symptoms appears to be of limited value due to its low sensitivity.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
T Sjaheim, T S Halstensen, M B Lund, O Bjortuft, P A Drablos, D Malterud, and J Kongerud
Airway inflammation in aluminium potroom asthma
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2004; 61(9): 779 - 785.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
C G Barnard, D I McBride, H M Firth, and G P Herbison
Assessing individual employee risk factors for occupational asthma in primary aluminium smelting
Occup. Environ. Med., July 1, 2004; 61(7): 604 - 608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the European Respiratory Society.