Non-invasive determination of alveolar pressure during mechanical ventilation

The development of inadvertent positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) in ventilated infants is of clinical relevance and difficult to measure non-invasively. A method for estimating end-expiratory alveolar pressure by applying a multiple regression analysis to airway opening pressure, flow and volume recordings during mechanical ventilation was evaluated. In eight open-chested, paralysed and mechanically ventilated mongrel dogs, alveolar pressure was measured directly with "alveolar capsules". Alteration of ventilation patterns and addition of a resistive element were used in three dogs to induce different levels of PEEPi. End-expiratory alveolar pressure measured directly and determined from multilinear regression of airway opening pressure correlated well (mean error 0.06 +/- 0.53 (+/- SD) hPa, limits of agreement -1.16 to +1.04 hPa). The other five dogs received inhalation challenges, two with histamine, two with hypertonic saline and one with methacholine resulting in a mean increase of respiratory system resistance of 230% (range 141-489%) of the baseline values. The mean error in determining PEEPi was 0.54 +/- 0.37 hPa, the limits of agreement were -0.20 to 1.28 hPa. The method was then applied to seven mechanically-ventilated children (aged 2 months to 8 yrs, weight 4.9-23.5 kg) and the results were compared to the pressure at which inspiration began (equalling PEEPi). Seventy eight measurements were performed during open heart surgery, while compliance changed by between 3 and 186% of baseline values due to the surgical procedures. PEEPi estimated by multiple regression agreed well with the pressure at which inspiration began (mean difference 0.25 +/- 0.68 hPa, limits of agreement -1.12 to 1.62 hPa).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Kessler, J. Guttmann, and C.J.L. Newth Dynamic respiratory system mechanics in infants during pressure and volume controlled ventilation Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2001; 17(1): 115 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Biro, M. Layer, H. D. Becker, F. Herth, K. Wiedemann, B. Seifert, and D. R. Spahn Influence of airway-occluding instruments on airway pressure during jet ventilation for rigid bronchoscopy Br. J. Anaesth., September 1, 2000; 85(3): 462 - 465. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I Schulze-Neick, D J Penny, G P Derrick, R Dhillon, M L Rigby, A Kelleher, A Bush, and A N Redington Pulmonary vascular-bronchial interactions: acute reduction in pulmonary blood flow alters lung mechanics Heart, September 1, 2000; 84(3): 284 - 289. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. UHLIG, J. H. WILDHABER, N. CARROLL, D. J. TURNER, P. R. GRAY, N. DORE, A. L. JAMES, and P. D. SLY Pulmonary Vascular Congestion Selectively Potentiates Airway Responsiveness in Piglets Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., April 1, 2000; 161(4): 1306 - 1313. [Abstract] [Full Text]

				W. Habre, P. Scalfaro, C. Sims, K. Tiller, and P. D. Sly Respiratory Mechanics During Sevoflurane Anesthesia in Children With and Without Asthma Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1177 - 1177. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]