ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Order Full text via Infotrieve
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bulzebruck, H
Right arrow Articles by Vogt-Moykopf, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bulzebruck, H
Right arrow Articles by Vogt-Moykopf, I
Eur Respir J 1991; 4: 1197-1206
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1991


Original Articles

Classification of lung cancer: first experiences with the new TNM classification (4th edition)

H Bulzebruck, P Drings, K Kayser, V Schulz, S Tuengerthal, and I Vogt-Moykopf

In January 1987, the 4th edition of the TNM classification for malignant lung tumours by the International Union Cancer (UICC) came into effect. Thus, for the first time, a uniform worldwide staging system for lung cancer became available. In order to validate the new TNM definitions for lung cancer the data of 3,000 patients were analysed prospectively. Several items were examined: 1) the agreement between clinically (TNM) and pathologically (pTNM) confirmed classification; 2) the value of the various diagnostic techniques estimating the pathologically confirmed classification; 3) the influence of the TNM definitions on separating distinct prognostic groups. With regard to the primary tumour (T), clinical and pathological classifications were identical in 64%; for lymph node involvement (N) the agreement was 48%; for distant metastases it was 90% and for the stages it was 55%. As for the primary tumour (T) the accuracy of radiography (59%) was nearly identical to computed tomography (58%). Both techniques were less precise in determining the extent of lymph node involvement (computed tomography 50%, radiography 43%, correct assessments). The statistically significant differences in prognosis for the various T-, N- and M-categories as well as for the stages could be confirmed. By the new 1987 TNM definitions (4th edition) for lung cancer international conformity became feasible as well as practical, and the improvement in its prognostic relevance provided, therefore, a more reliable basis for establishing guidelines for individual oncological concepts of therapy.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Ann. Thorac. Surg.Home page
A. Lopez-Encuentra, R. Garcia-Lujan, J. Jose Rivas, J. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, J. Torres-Lanza, G. Varela-Simo, and Bronchogenic Carcinoma Cooperative Group of the Sp
Comparison Between Clinical and Pathologic Staging in 2,994 Cases of Lung Cancer
Ann. Thorac. Surg., March 1, 2005; 79(3): 974 - 979.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. D. Brundage, D. Davies, and W. J. Mackillop
Prognostic Factors in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer* : A Decade of Progress
Chest, September 1, 2002; 122(3): 1037 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Gen PsychiatryHome page
H. Faller, H. Bulzebruck, P. Drings, and H. Lang
Coping, Distress, and Survival Among Patients With Lung Cancer
Arch Gen Psychiatry, August 1, 1999; 56(8): 756 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1991 by the European Respiratory Society.