| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
1 National Public Health Institute, Kuopio, Finland, and 2 Inst. Municipal D'Investigacio Medica (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain, and 3 Dept Public Health Sciences, King's College, London, UK.
CORRESPONDENCE: J. Pekkanen, Unit of Environmental Epidemiology, National Public Health Institute, P.O. Box 95, 70701 Kuopio, Finland. Fax: 358 17201265. E-mail: Juha.Pekkanen@ktl.fi
Keywords: Asthma, definition, epidemiology, methods, risk factor
Received: October 21, 2004
Accepted March 29, 2005
The most popular way to define asthma based on questionnaires is to use definitions taken from cross-sectional international studies on asthma. These definitions may not, however, be optimal for future studies focusing on risk factors of asthma. The current authors, therefore, compared the performance of different operational definitions of asthma.
The European Community Respiratory Health Study I was a cross-sectional study of 21,924 subjects aged between 25–44 yrs in 18 countries. Operational definitions of asthma compared included different combinations of symptoms of asthma and bronchial hyperresponsiveness. A continuous asthma score, ranging from 0–8, was defined as the sum of positive answers to eight main symptom questions.
There was no threshold in the associations of asthma symptoms with severity or risk factors of asthma, which would have suggested a dichotomous definition of asthma. Using dichotomous definitions requiring the presence of several asthma symptoms strengthened associations with studied risk factors, and also increased the estimated specificity and positive predictive value. Using a continuous asthma score also improved the power of the analyses.
In conclusion, dichotomous definitions of asthma yielding higher odds ratios are achieved by requiring positive responses to several questions on symptoms. However, symptoms of asthma are possibly best analysed as a continuous asthma score.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. Rage, V. Siroux, N. Le Moual, I. Pin, and F. Kauffmann Are asymptomatic airway hyperresponsiveness and allergy risk factors for asthma? A longitudinal study Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2009; 33(1): 218 - 219. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Skjold, R. Dahl, B. Juhl, and T. Sigsgaard The incidence of respiratory symptoms and sensitisation in baker apprentices Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2008; 32(2): 452 - 459. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
I. Romieu, F. Castro-Giner, N. Kunzli, and J. Sunyer Air pollution, oxidative stress and dietary supplementation: a review Eur. Respir. J., January 1, 2008; 31(1): 179 - 197. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Bouzigon, V. Siroux, M-H. Dizier, A. Lemainque, C. Pison, M. Lathrop, F. Kauffmann, F. Demenais, and I. Pin Scores of asthma and asthma severity reveal new regions of linkage in EGEA study families Eur. Respir. J., August 1, 2007; 30(2): 253 - 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. C. Smeeton, R. J. Rona, M. Oyarzun, and P. V. Diaz Agreement between Responses to a Standardized Asthma Questionnaire and a Questionnaire following a Demonstration of Asthma Symptoms in Adults Am. J. Epidemiol., February 15, 2006; 163(4): 384 - 391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. B. Marks Identifying asthma in population studies: from single entity to a multi-component approach Eur. Respir. J., July 1, 2005; 26(1): 3 - 5. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
