ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Permissions
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van der Palen, J
Right arrow Articles by Seydel, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van der Palen, J
Right arrow Articles by Seydel, E.
Eur Respir J 1999; 14: 1034-1037
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1999


Original Articles

Multiple inhalers confuse asthma patients

J van der Palen, JJ Klein, CL van Herwaarden, GA Zielhuis, and ER Seydel

This study investigated the influence of the use of different types of inhalers on the adequacy of inhalation technique among adult asthmatics. Three hypotheses were tested: first, patients using only one type of inhaler will demonstrate adequate inhalation technique more often than those with two or more types. Secondly, patients using a combination of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) will demonstrate correct inhalation technique more often than those using the combination of a metered dose inhaler (MDI) and a DPI. Thirdly, some inhalers or combinations of inhalers are more prone to erroneous inhalation technique than others. Adult outpatients with asthma who regularly used inhaled steroid therapy (n=321) participated in the study. The inhalers investigated were MDIs on the one hand, and the DPIs Turbuhaler, Diskhaler, Cyclohaler, Inhaler Ingelheim and Rotahaler on the other. Of 208 adult asthmatics with only one inhaler, 71% made no inhalation errors versus 61% of 113 patients with two or more different inhalers. Of patients with a combination of DPIs 68% performed all essential checklist items correctly, versus 54% of patients with the combination of "regular" MDI and DPI. Patients using only the Diskhaler made fewest errors. Whenever possible, only one type of inhaler should be prescribed. If a combination is unavoidable, combinations of DPIs are preferable to MDI and DPI. The Diskhaler seems to be the most foolproof device.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
The Annals of PharmacotherapyHome page
D. S Chan, C. W Callahan, V. B Hatch-Pigott, A. Lawless, H L. Proffitt, N. E Manning, and M. P Schweikert
Concurrent Use of Metered-Dose and Dry Powder Inhalers by Children with Persistent Asthma Does Not Adversely Affect Spacer/Inhaler Technique
Ann. Pharmacother., October 1, 2006; 40(10): 1743 - 1746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ERRHome page
K. R. Chapman, T. H. Voshaar, and J. C. Virchow
Inhaler choice in primary practice
Eur. Respir. Rev., December 1, 2005; 14(96): 117 - 122.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. Becker, C. Lemiere, D. Berube, L.-P. Boulet, F. M. Ducharme, M. FitzGerald, T. Kovesi, and on behalf of The Asthma Guidelines Working Group o
Summary of recommendations from the Canadian Asthma Consensus Guidelines, 2003
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6_suppl): S3 - S11.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
Inhalation devices
Can. Med. Assoc. J., September 13, 2005; 173(6_suppl): S39 - S45.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
Statement on Home Care for Patients with Respiratory Disorders
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 15, 2005; 171(12): 1443 - 1464.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the European Respiratory Society.