ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vansteenkiste, J
Right arrow Articles by Demedts, M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vansteenkiste, J
Right arrow Articles by Demedts, M
Eur Respir J 1999; 14: 585-590
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1999


Original Articles

Medical thoracoscopic lung biopsy in interstitial lung disease: a prospective study of biopsy quality

J Vansteenkiste, E Verbeken, M Thomeer, P Van Haecke, AV Eeckhout, and M Demedts

The aim of this study was to analyse the quality and diagnostic value of lung biopsies for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD), taken with diathermy coagulation cup forceps during medical thoracoscopy. Patients with ILD, not specified after thorough clinical assessment, high-resolution CT (HRCT), bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial biopsy, were studied. Medical thoracoscopy was performed in an endoscopy suite under neuroleptic anaesthesia with spontaneous ventilation. Biopsy specimens were analysed prospectively by one lung pathologist blinded to the clinical findings. Over 2 yrs, 118 samples were analysed from 24 consecutive patients. A good quality biopsy was obtained in 23 patients, and 78% of the samples were of good quality. Biopsy findings plus clinical and HRCT data revealed a relevant diagnosis in 18 patients and some diagnostic clues in four patients, for whom further examinations were needed. No major complications occurred. Chest tube drainage averaged 5.3+/-4.7 days, and was related to the total lung capacity (p=0.008), which mirrors the severity of ILD. Separate sampling of biopsies from different lobes proved to be useful in one third of the cases. In conclusion, lung biopsy sampling can be performed safely by interventional pulmonary endoscopists and has a good diagnostic yield in interstitial lung disease of unknown origin.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
G. F. Tassi, R. J. O. Davies, and M. Noppen
Advanced techniques in medical thoracoscopy.
Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2006; 28(5): 1051 - 1059.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
M. C. Fishbein
Diagnosis: To Biopsy or Not to Biopsy: Assessing the Role of Surgical Lung Biopsy in the Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
Chest, November 1, 2005; 128(5_suppl_1): 520S - 525S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
L. Tiitto, U. Heiskanen, R. Bloigu, P. Paakko, V. Kinnula, and R. Kaarteenaho-Wiik
Thoracoscopic Lung Biopsy Is a Safe Procedure in Diagnosing Usual Interstitial Pneumonia
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2375 - 2380.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the European Respiratory Society.