ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ward, R.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ward, R.
Right arrow Articles by Walters, E.
Eur Respir J 1999; 14: 430-434
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1999


Original Articles

A critical evaluation of the Mefar dosimeter

RJ Ward, P Liakakos, RF Leonard, DW Reid, DP Johns, and EH Walters

Multicentre studies of airway responsiveness (AR) are increasingly important tools in asthma epidemiology. Because comparisons of AR are made between centres it is essential that measurement techniques are accurate and standard. This study investigated the Mefar dosimeter which is currently used in the 35 centre European Community Respiratory Health Survey (ECRHS) with the next phase currently being planned. Significant differences were found in driving pressures and aerosol outputs between the three Mefar dosimeters in the laboratory. A linear relationship was also found between driving pressure and aerosol output (R2=0.96). These differences are important as they may lead to variations between centres of < or =35% in the drug dose delivered in AR measurement, which could potentially diminish the power of individual study centres to accurately detect national differences in AR. Dosimeter driving pressure and nebulizer output should be standardized in future studies of airway responsiveness. With relatively simple quality control measures in place it is believed that the Mefar dosimeter can produce reliable between-centre longitudinal data with an increase in the accuracy of these important studies.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
J. Knox, D. Jarvis, and on behalf of the ECRHS II Steering Committee
The European Community Respiratory Health Survey II
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2003; 21(3): 556 - 560.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
E.H. Walters
From the Authors
Eur. Respir. J., March 1, 2003; 21(3): 556 - 556.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
R.J. Ward, C. Ward, D.P. Johns, B. Skoric, M. Abramson, and E.H. Walters
European Community Respiratory Health Survey calibration project of dosimeter driving pressures
Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(2): 252 - 256.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the European Respiratory Society.