Contribution of noninvasive evaluation to the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalized patients

The effectiveness of new diagnostic tools for suspected pulmonary embolism (PE), such as clinical probability assessment, plasma D-dimer (DD) measurement and lower limb venous compression ultrasonography (US), has not been specifically studied in patients with a suspected PE occurring during hospital stay. This study applied a sequential, decision analysis-based strategy adding these instruments to a ventilation/perfusion lung scan in a cohort of 114 consecutive inpatients clinically suspected of PE in order to establish in how many patients a pulmonary angiogram could thereby be avoided. A definitive diagnosis could be established by the noninvasive protocol in 61% of these patients: normal/near-normal lung scan, 14%; high probability lung scan, 19%; clinical probability combined with lung scan result, 18%; and US, 8%. Specificity of DD was only 7% and contributed to the exclusion of PE in only two patients. Pulmonary angiography was required in 39% of patients. The 3-month thromboembolic risk in patients in whom PE was excluded by the diagnostic process was 0% (95% confidence interval 0-4.9%). In conclusion, a noninvasive work-up for suspected pulmonary embolism is effective in hospitalized patients, allowing to forego angiography in 61% of them, and it appears to be safe, although this should be further investigated. In contrast to outpatients, D-dimer measurement appears to be useless in hospitalized patients.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				Authors/Task Force Members, A. Torbicki, A. Perrier, S. Konstantinides, G. Agnelli, N. Galie, P. Pruszczyk, F. Bengel, A. J.B. Brady, D. Ferreira, et al. Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2276 - 2315. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Jouveshomme, I. Bohn, and A. Cazaban Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in hospitalised patients: retrospective survey of an institutional standard Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2007; 30(6): 1117 - 1123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Remy-Jardin, M. Pistolesi, L. R. Goodman, W. B. Gefter, A. Gottschalk, J. R. Mayo, and H. D. Sostman Management of Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism in the Era of CT Angiography: A Statement from the Fleischner Society Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 315 - 329. [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Le Gal, M. Righini, P.-M. Roy, O. Sanchez, D. Aujesky, A. Perrier, and H. Bounameaux Value of D-Dimer Testing for the Exclusion of Pulmonary Embolism in Patients With Previous Venous Thromboembolism Arch Intern Med, January 23, 2006; 166(2): 176 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.-M. Roy, I. Colombet, P. Durieux, G. Chatellier, H. Sors, and G. Meyer Systematic review and meta-analysis of strategies for the diagnosis of suspected pulmonary embolism BMJ, July 30, 2005; 331(7511): 259. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Righini, D. Aujesky, P.-M. Roy, J. Cornuz, P. de Moerloose, H. Bounameaux, and A. Perrier Clinical Usefulness of D-Dimer Depending on Clinical Probability and Cutoff Value in Outpatients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism Arch Intern Med, December 13, 2004; 164(22): 2483 - 2487. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Riedel Diagnosing pulmonary embolism Postgrad. Med. J., June 1, 2004; 80(944): 309 - 319. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Perrier D-dimer for Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Whom Should We Test? Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 807 - 809. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. W. Rathbun, T. L. Whitsett, S. K. Vesely, and G. E. Raskob Clinical Utility of D-dimer in Patients With Suspected Pulmonary Embolism and Nondiagnostic Lung Scans or Negative CT Findings Chest, March 1, 2004; 125(3): 851 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Wakai, A Gleeson, and D Winter Role of fibrin D-dimer testing in emergency medicine Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2003; 20(4): 319 - 325. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J.H.A. Kruip, M. G.L. Leclercq, C. v. d. Heul, M. H. Prins, and H. R. Buller Diagnostic Strategies for Excluding Pulmonary Embolism in Clinical Outcome Studies: A Systematic Review Ann Intern Med, June 17, 2003; 138(12): 941 - 951. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism Thorax, June 1, 2003; 58(6): 470 - 483. [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. Kearon Diagnosis of pulmonary embolism Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 21, 2003; 168(2): 183 - 194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. L. Dunn, J. P. Wolf, D. M. Dorfman, P. Fitzpatrick, J. L. Baker, and S. Z. Goldhaber Normal D-dimer levels in emergency department patients suspected of acute pulmonary embolism J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 16, 2002; 40(8): 1475 - 1478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Pistolesi and M. Miniati Imaging techniques in treatment algorithms of pulmonary embolism Eur. Respir. J., February 1, 2002; 19(35_suppl): 28S - 39s. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N.L. Muller Advances in imaging Eur. Respir. J., November 1, 2001; 18(5): 867 - 871. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.B. Donkers-van Rossum Diagnostic strategies for suspected pulmonary embolism Eur. Respir. J., September 1, 2001; 18(3): 589 - 597. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Guidelines on diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism Eur. Heart J., August 2, 2000; 21(16): 1301 - 1336. [PDF]

				A. Perrier, M.-J. Miron, S. Desmarais, P. de Moerloose, D. Slosman, D. Didier, P.-F. Unger, A. Junod, J.-V. Patenaude, and H. Bounameaux Using Clinical Evaluation and Lung Scan to Rule Out Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: Is It a Valid Option in Patients With Normal Results of Lower-Limb Venous Compression Ultrasonography? Arch Intern Med, February 28, 2000; 160(4): 512 - 516. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]