ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Blanch, L
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Blanch, L
Right arrow Articles by Romero, P.
Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 1048-1054
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1999


Original Articles

Volumetric capnography in patients with acute lung injury: effects of positive end-expiratory pressure

L Blanch, U Lucangelo, J Lopez-Aguilar, R Fernandez, and PV Romero

The aim of the study was to analyse the effects of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on volumetric capnography and respiratory system mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients. Eight normal subjects (control group), nine patients with moderate acute lung injury (ALI group) and eight patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS group) were studied. Respiratory system mechanics, alveolar ejection volume as a fraction of tidal volume (VAE/VT), phase III slopes of expired CO2 beyond VAE and Bohr's dead space (VD/VT(Bohr)) at different levels of PEEP were measured. No differences in respiratory system resistances were found between the ALI and ARDS groups. VD/VT(Bohr) and expired CO2 slope beyond VAE were higher in ALI patients (0.52+/-0.01 and 13.9+/-0.7 mmHg x L(-1), respectively) compared with control patients (0.46+/-0.01 and 7.7+/-0.4 mmHg x L(-1), p<0.01, respectively) and in ARDS patients (0.61+/-0.02 and 24.9+/-1.6 mmHg x L(-1), p<0.01, respectively) compared with ALI patients. VAE/VT differed similarly (0.6+/-0.01 in control group, 0.43+/-0.01 in ALI group and 0.31+/-0.01 in ARDS group, p<0.01). PEEP had no effect on VAE/VT, expired CO2 slope beyond VAE and VD/VT(Bohr) in any group. A significant correlation (p<0.01) was found between VAE/VT and expired CO2 slope beyond VAE and lung injury score at zero PEEP. Indices of volumetric capnography are affected by the severity of the lung injury, but are unmodified by the application of positive end-expiratory pressure.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
ChestHome page
U. Lucangelo, F. Bernabe, S. Vatua, G. Degrassi, A. Villagra, R. Fernandez, P. V. Romero, P. Saura, M. Borelli, and L. Blanch
Prognostic Value of Different Dead Space Indices in Mechanically Ventilated Patients With Acute Lung Injury and ARDS
Chest, January 1, 2008; 133(1): 62 - 71.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
R. P. R. Smith and R. Fletcher
Positive End-Expiratory Pressure Has Little Effect on Carbon Dioxide Elimination After Cardiac Surgery
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2000; 90(1): 85 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the European Respiratory Society.