ERJ
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lim, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, W.
Eur Respir J 1999; 13: 163-168
Copyright © ERS Journals Ltd 1999


Original Articles

Respiratory and haemodynamic effects of the prone position at two different levels of PEEP in a canine acute lung injury model

CM Lim, Y Koh, JY Chin, JS Lee, SD Lee, WS Kim, DS Kim, and WD Kim

This study was designed to examine whether the oxygenation response in the prone position differs in magnitude depending on the level of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) applied in the supine position, and whether cardiac output (CO) increases in the prone position. In seven supine dogs, acute lung injury was established by saline lavage (arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2)/inspiratory oxygen fraction (FI,O2) 17.8+/-9.6 kPa (134+/-72 mmHg)), and inflection point (Pflex) of the respiratory system was measured (6.6+/-1.4 cmH2O). Pa,O2/FI,O2 and CO of the supine and prone positions were obtained under the application of low PEEP and then under optimal PEEP (2 cmH2O below and above Pflex, respectively). The net increase in Pa,O2/FI,O2 by prone positioning was greater at low PEEP (27.3+/-12.0 kPa (205+/-90 mmHg)) than at optimal PEEP (4.4+/-13.0 kPa (33+/-98 mmHg)) (p=0.006). CO decreased significantly with optimal PEEP in the supine position (2.4+/-0.5 versus 3.1+/-0.4 L x min(-1) at baseline, p<0.001), and increased to 3.4+/-0.6 and 3.6+/-0.7 L x min(-1) in the prone position at 5 min and 30 min, respectively (both p=0.018). When the dogs were turned supine at optimal PEEP, CO again decreased (2.4+/-0.5 L x min(-1), p<0.001). In conclusion, the prone position augmented the effect of relatively low positive end-expiratory pressure on oxygenation, and attenuated the haemodynamic impairment of relatively high positive end-expiratory pressure in a canine acute lung injury model.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
K. von der Hardt, M.A. Kandler, M. Chada, A. Cubra, E. Schoof, K. Amann, W. Rascher, and J. Dotsch
Brief adrenomedullin inhalation leads to sustained reduction of pulmonary artery pressure
Eur. Respir. J., October 1, 2004; 24(4): 615 - 623.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
N. CAKAR, T. V. d. KLOOT, M. YOUNGBLOOD, A. ADAMS, and A. NAHUM
Oxygenation Response to a Recruitment Maneuver during Supine and Prone Positions in an Oleic Acid-Induced Lung Injury Model
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., June 1, 2000; 161(6): 1949 - 1956.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 1999 by the European Respiratory Society.